Early Budhism

As the Sa?gha gradually grew over the nextSa?gha started to accumulate an Abhidharma, a
century a dispute arose regarding ten points ofcollection of philosophical texts. Early sources for
discipline. A Second Buddhist Council (said in thethese probably existed in the time of the Buddha
scriptures to have taken place 100 years afteras simple lists. However, as time went on and
the Buddha's death) was held to resolve theBuddhism spread further, the (perceived)
points at dispute. The result was that all theteachings of the Buddha were formalized in a
monks agreed that those 10 practices weremore systematic manner in a new Pitaka: the
unallowed according to Vinaya.Abhidhamma Pitaka. Some modern academics
At some period after the Second Councilrefer to it as Abhidhamma Buddhism.
however, the Sangha began to break intoInterestingly, in the opinion of some scholars, the
separate factions. The various accounts differ asMahasanghika school did not have an Abhidhamma
to when the actual schisms occurred: according toPitaka, which agrees with their statement that
the Dipavamsa of the Pali tradition, they startedthey did not want to add to the Buddha's
immediately after the Second Council; theteachings. But according to Chinese pilgrims Fa
Puggalavada tradition places it in 137 AN; theXian (5th century CE) and Yuan Chwang (7th
Sarvastivada tradition of Vasumitra says it was incentury CE), they had procured a copy of
the time of Asoka; and the Mahasanghika traditionAbhidhamma which belonged to the Mahasanghika
places it much later, nearly 100 BCE.School.
The Asokan edicts, our only contemporaryBuddhism may have spread only slowly in India
sources, state that 'the Sangha has been madeuntil the time of the Mauryan emperor
unified'. This apparently refers to a dispute suchAśoka the Great, who was a public
as that described in the account of the Thirdsupporter of the religion. The support of
Buddhist Council at Pataliputta. This concerns theAśoka and his descendants led to the
expulsion of non-Buddhist heretics from theconstruction of more Buddhist religious memorials
Sangha, and does not speak of a schism.(stupas) and to efforts to spread Buddhism
These schisms occurred within the traditions ofthroughout the enlarged Maurya empire and even
Early Buddhism, at a time when the Mahayanainto neighboring lands – particularly to
movement either did not exist at all, or onlythe Iranian-speaking regions of Afghanistan and
existed as a current of thought not yet identifiedCentral Asia, beyond the Mauryas' northwest
with a separate school.border, and to the island of Sri Lanka south of
The root schism was between the Sthaviras andIndia. These two missions, in opposite directions,
the Mahasa?ghikas. The fortunate survival ofwould ultimately lead, in the first case to the
accounts from both sides of the dispute revealsspread of Buddhism into China, and in the second
disparate traditions. The Sthavira group offerscase, to the emergence of Theravada Buddhism
two quite distinct reasons for the schism. Theand its spread from Sri Lanka to the coastal lands
Dipavamsa of the Theravada says that the losingof Southeast Asia.
party in the Second Council dispute broke away inThis period marks the first known spread of
protest and formed the Mahasanghika. ThisBuddhism beyond India. According to the edicts of
contradicts the Mahasanghikas' own vinaya, whichAśoka, emissaries were sent to various
shows them as on the same, winning side. On thecountries west of India in order to spread
other hand, the northern lineages, including the"Dhamma", particularly in eastern provinces of the
Sarvastivada and Puggalavada (both branches ofneighboring Seleucid Empire, and even farther to
the ancient Sthaviras) attribute the Mahasa?ghikaHellenistic kingdoms of the Mediterranean. This led,
schism to the '5 points' that erode the status ofa century later, to the emergence of
the arahant. For their part, the Mahasa?ghikasGreek-speaking Buddhist monarchs in the
argued that the Sthaviras were trying to expandIndo-Greek Kingdom, and to the development of
the Vinaya; they may also have challenged whatthe Greco-Buddhist art of Gandhara. During this
they perceived to be excessive claims orperiod Buddhism was exposed to a variety of
inhumanly high criteria for Arhatship. Both parties,influences, from Persian and Greek civilization, and
therefore, appealed to tradition. The Sthavirasfrom changing trends in non-Buddhist Indian
gave rise to several schools, one of which wasreligions – themselves influenced by
the Theravada school.Buddhism.
Following (or leading up to) the schisms, each