Discover Budhism


Early Budhism

As the Sa?gha gradually grew over the nextof  which  was  the  Theravada  school.
century a dispute arose regarding ten points
of discipline. A Second Buddhist CouncilFollowing (or leading up to) the schisms,
(said in the scriptures to have taken placeeach Sa?gha started to accumulate an
100 years after the Buddha's death) was heldAbhidharma, a collection of philosophical
to resolve the points at dispute. The resulttexts. Early sources for these probably
was that all the monks agreed that those 10existed in the time of the Buddha as simple
practices were unallowed according to Vinaya.lists. However, as time went on and Buddhism
spread further, the (perceived) teachings of
At some period after the Second Councilthe Buddha were formalized in a more
however, the Sangha began to break intosystematic manner in a new Pitaka: the
separate factions. The various accountsAbhidhamma Pitaka. Some modern academics
differ as to when the actual schismsrefer to it as Abhidhamma Buddhism.
occurred: according to the Dipavamsa of theInterestingly, in the opinion of some
Pali tradition, they started immediatelyscholars, the Mahasanghika school did not
after the Second Council; the Puggalavadahave an Abhidhamma Pitaka, which agrees with
tradition places it in 137 AN; thetheir statement that they did not want to add
Sarvastivada tradition of Vasumitra says itto the Buddha's teachings. But according to
was in the time of Asoka; and theChinese pilgrims Fa Xian (5th century CE) and
Mahasanghika tradition places it much later,Yuan Chwang (7th century CE), they had
nearly  100  BCE.procured a copy of Abhidhamma which belonged
to  the  Mahasanghika  School.
The Asokan edicts, our only contemporary
sources, state that 'the Sangha has been madeBuddhism may have spread only slowly in India
unified'. This apparently refers to a disputeuntil the time of the Mauryan emperor
such as that described in the account of theAśoka the Great, who was a public
Third Buddhist Council at Pataliputta. Thissupporter of the religion. The support of
concerns the expulsion of non-BuddhistAśoka and his descendants led to the
heretics from the Sangha, and does not speakconstruction of more Buddhist religious
of  a  schism.memorials (stupas) and to efforts to spread
Buddhism throughout the enlarged Maurya
These schisms occurred within the traditionsempire and even into neighboring lands
of Early Buddhism, at a time when the– particularly to the Iranian-speaking
Mahayana movement either did not exist atregions of Afghanistan and Central Asia,
all, or only existed as a current of thoughtbeyond the Mauryas' northwest border, and to
not  yet  identified  with a separate school.the island of Sri Lanka south of India. These
two missions, in opposite directions, would
The root schism was between the Sthaviras andultimately lead, in the first case to the
the Mahasa?ghikas. The fortunate survival ofspread of Buddhism into China, and in the
accounts from both sides of the disputesecond case, to the emergence of Theravada
reveals disparate traditions. The SthaviraBuddhism and its spread from Sri Lanka to the
group offers two quite distinct reasons forcoastal  lands  of  Southeast  Asia.
the schism. The Dipavamsa of the Theravada
says that the losing party in the SecondThis period marks the first known spread of
Council dispute broke away in protest andBuddhism beyond India. According to the
formed the Mahasanghika. This contradicts theedicts of Aśoka, emissaries were sent to
Mahasanghikas' own vinaya, which shows themvarious countries west of India in order to
as on the same, winning side. On the otherspread "Dhamma", particularly in eastern
hand, the northern lineages, including theprovinces of the neighboring Seleucid Empire,
Sarvastivada and Puggalavada (both branchesand even farther to Hellenistic kingdoms of
of the ancient Sthaviras) attribute thethe Mediterranean. This led, a century later,
Mahasa?ghika schism to the '5 points' thatto the emergence of Greek-speaking Buddhist
erode the status of the arahant. For theirmonarchs in the Indo-Greek Kingdom, and to
part, the Mahasa?ghikas argued that thethe development of the Greco-Buddhist art of
Sthaviras were trying to expand the Vinaya;Gandhara. During this period Buddhism was
they may also have challenged what theyexposed to a variety of influences, from
perceived to be excessive claims or inhumanlyPersian and Greek civilization, and from
high criteria for Arhatship. Both parties,changing trends in non-Buddhist Indian
therefore, appealed to tradition. Thereligions – themselves influenced by
Sthaviras gave rise to several schools, oneBuddhism.



1 A B C 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 58 60 61 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90